Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Komatsu D53A-15 vs Komatsu D41E-6C

A detailed comparison of the Komatsu D53A-15 and the Komatsu D41E-6C. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Komatsu D53A-1582.0 kW (110 HP)
Komatsu D41E-6C82.0 kW (110 HP)
Operating Weight
Komatsu D53A-1510069.7 kg (22200 lbs)
Komatsu D41E-6C10949.7 kg (24140 lbs)
SpecificationKomatsu D53A-15Komatsu D53A-15Crawler DozersKomatsu D41E-6CKomatsu D41E-6CCrawler Dozers
TypeCrawler DozerCrawler Dozer
Horsepower82.0 kW (110 HP)82.0 kW (110 HP)
Operating Weight10069.7 kg (22200 lbs)10949.7 kg (24140 lbs)
Engine ManufacturerKomatsuKomatsu
Engine ModelS4D120-11SA6D102E-2A
Gross Power82.0 kW (110 HP)—
AspirationTurbocharged—
Displacement7243.1 cc (442 cu in.)5883.0 cc (359 cu in.)
Transmission TypePlanetary GearHydroshift
Number of Forward Gears33
Number of Reverse Gears33
Max Speed Forward10.3 km/h (6.4 mph)7.6 km/h (4.7 mph)
Max Speed Reverse12.2 km/h (7.6 mph)9.3 km/h (5.8 mph)
Ground Pressure0.6 bar (8.2 psi)0.3 bar (5 psi)
Fuel Capacity240.4 l (63.5 gal)249.8 l (66 gal)
Cooling System Capacity53.4 l (14.1 gal)28.0 l (7.4 gal)
Width Over Track207.3 cm (81.6 in.)179.8 cm (70.8 in.)
Length without Blade356.6 cm (140.4 in.)—
Length of Track on Ground222.5 cm (87.6 in.)249.9 cm (98.4 in.)
Track Gauge161.5 cm (63.6 in.)179.8 cm (70.8 in.)
No of Track Rollers Per Side56
Shoe Size40.1 cm (15.8 in.)50.8 cm (20 in.)
Weight (Operating)10069.7 kg (22200 lbs)10949.7 kg (24140 lbs)
Net Power—82.0 kW (110 HP)
Number of Cylinders—6
Engine Oil Capacity—18.9 l (5 gal)
Hydraulic Capacity—43.9 l (11.6 gal)
Final Drives Capacity—12.9 l (3.4 gal)
Relief Valve Pressure—206.2 bar (2990 psi)
Cab Height—289.6 cm (114.0 in.)
Length Overall—490.7 cm (193.2 in.)
Ground Clearance—36.6 cm (14.4 in.)
Ground Contact Area—64401.3 cm³ (3930 cu in.)
No of Shoes Per Side—41
Track Pitch—177.8 cm (70 in.)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons