Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Komatsu D50A-16 vs Komatsu D39PX-23

A detailed comparison of the Komatsu D50A-16 and the Komatsu D39PX-23. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Komatsu D50A-1682.0 kW (110 HP)
Komatsu D39PX-2379.8 kW (107 HP)
Operating Weight
Komatsu D50A-1611880.0 kg (26191 lbs)
Komatsu D39PX-239830.0 kg (21671.5 lbs)
SpecificationKomatsu D50A-16Komatsu D50A-16Crawler DozersKomatsu D39PX-23Komatsu D39PX-23Crawler Dozers
TypeCrawler DozerCrawler Dozer
Horsepower82.0 kW (110 HP)79.8 kW (107 HP)
Operating Weight11880.0 kg (26191 lbs)9830.0 kg (21671.5 lbs)
Engine ManufacturerKomatsuKomatsu
Engine Model4 D130-1CSAA4D95LE
Gross Power82.0 kW (110 HP)79.8 kW (107 HP)
Number of Cylinders4—
Displacement8750.7 cc (534 cu in.)3261.0 cc (199 cu in.)
Power Measured RPM1900 RPM2200 RPM
Transmission TypeDirect Drive—
Number of Forward Gears43
Number of Reverse Gears33
Max Speed Forward9.2 km/h (5.7 mph)8.5 km/h (5.3 mph)
Max Speed Reverse8.0 km/h (5 mph)8.5 km/h (5.3 mph)
Ground Pressure0.5 bar (7 psi)0.3 bar (4.7 psi)
Fuel Capacity240.4 l (63.5 gal)190.0 l (50.2 gal)
Cooling System Capacity50.3 l (13.3 gal)34.1 l (9 gal)
Cab Height286.5 cm (112.8 in.)286.5 cm (112.8 in.)
Width Over Track234.7 cm (92.4 in.)298.7 cm (117.6 in.)
Length Overall457.2 cm (180.0 in.)—
Length without Blade362.7 cm (142.8 in.)438.9 cm (172.8 in.)
Length of Track on Ground222.5 cm (87.6 in.)—
Track Gauge189.0 cm (74.4 in.)182.9 cm (72.0 in.)
Ground Clearance33.5 cm (13.2 in.)39.6 cm (15.6 in.)
No of Carrier Rollers Per Side2—
No of Shoes Per Side3939
No of Track Rollers Per Side56
Shoe Size46.2 cm (18.2 in.)63.5 cm (25 in.)
Weight (Operating)11880.0 kg (26191 lbs)9830.0 kg (21671.5 lbs)
Track Pitch17.5 cm (6.9 in.)—
Net Power—78.3 kW (105 HP)
Engine Oil Capacity—11.4 l (3 gal)
Hydraulic Capacity—60.2 l (15.9 gal)
Final Drives Capacity—3.8 l (1 gal)
Ground Contact Area—60763.4 cm³ (3708 cu in.)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons