Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Komatsu D475A-2 vs Caterpillar D11N

A detailed comparison of the Komatsu D475A-2 and the Caterpillar D11N. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Komatsu D475A-2582.4 kW (781 HP)
Caterpillar D11N574.2 kW (770 HP)
Operating Weight
Komatsu D475A-285500.0 kg (188495.3 lbs)
Caterpillar D11N95845.9 kg (211304.3 lbs)
SpecificationKomatsu D475A-2Komatsu D475A-2Crawler DozersCaterpillar D11NCaterpillar D11NCrawler Dozers
TypeCrawler DozerCrawler Dozer
Horsepower582.4 kW (781 HP)574.2 kW (770 HP)
Operating Weight85500.0 kg (188495.3 lbs)95845.9 kg (211304.3 lbs)
Engine ManufacturerKomatsuCaterpillar
Engine ModelSA12V1403508
Gross Power582.4 kW (781 HP)574.2 kW (770 HP)
Number of Cylinders12—
Displacement30481.6 cc (1860.1 cu in.)34501.4 cc (2105.4 cu in.)
Power Measured RPM2200 RPM—
Transmission TypeTorqflowPowerShift
Number of Forward Gears33
Number of Reverse Gears33
Cab Height457.2 cm (180.0 in.)457.2 cm (180.0 in.)
Width Over Track365.8 cm (144.0 in.)381.0 cm (150.0 in.)
Length Overall11.6 m (454.8 in. (1155.2 cm))841.2 cm (331.2 in.)
Length without Blade643.1 cm (253.2 in.)618.7 cm (243.6 in.)
Length of Track on Ground420.6 cm (165.6 in.)445.0 cm (175.2 in.)
Track Gauge277.4 cm (109.2 in.)289.6 cm (114.0 in.)
Ground Clearance67.1 cm (26.4 in.)64.0 cm (25.2 in.)
No of Carrier Rollers Per Side2—
No of Shoes Per Side39—
No of Track Rollers Per Side88
Shoe Size71.1 cm (28 in.)71.1 cm (28 in.)
Weight (Operating)85500.0 kg (188495.3 lbs)95845.9 kg (211304.3 lbs)
Track Pitch31.8 cm (12.5 in.)—
Pump Flow—610.2 LPM (161.2 GPM)
Aspiration—Turbocharged
Max Speed Forward—11.7 km/h (7.3 mph)
Max Speed Reverse—14.2 km/h (8.8 mph)
Ground Pressure—1.5 bar (21.7 psi)
Fuel Capacity—1490.3 l (393.7 gal)
Hydraulic Capacity—169.2 l (44.7 gal)
Hydraulic Pump Flow—610.2 LPM (161.2 GPM)
Relief Valve Pressure—227.5 bar (3300 psi)
Ground Contact Area—160529.7 cm³ (9796.1 cu in.)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons