Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Komatsu D31P-20BE vs Case 455C

A detailed comparison of the Komatsu D31P-20BE and the Case 455C. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Komatsu D31P-20BE52.9 kW (71 HP)
Case 455C52.9 kW (71 HP)
Operating Weight
Komatsu D31P-20BE6930.0 kg (15278.1 lbs)
Case 455C6546.0 kg (14431.5 lbs)
SpecificationKomatsu D31P-20BEKomatsu D31P-20BECrawler DozersCase 455CCase 455CCrawler Dozers
TypeCrawler DozerCrawler Dozer
Horsepower52.9 kW (71 HP)52.9 kW (71 HP)
Operating Weight6930.0 kg (15278.1 lbs)6546.0 kg (14431.5 lbs)
Engine ManufacturerKomatsuCase
Engine ModelS4D102E-1-A4-390
Gross Power52.9 kW (71 HP)52.9 kW (71 HP)
Number of Cylinders44
Displacement3921.4 cc (239.3 cu in.)3916.5 cc (239 cu in.)
Power Measured RPM2350 RPM2100 RPM
Transmission TypeHydrostatic—
Number of Forward Gears34
Number of Reverse Gears34
Cab Height274.3 cm (108.0 in.)256.0 cm (100.8 in.)
Width Over Track225.6 cm (88.8 in.)167.6 cm (66.0 in.)
Length Overall396.2 cm (156.0 in.)—
Length without Blade304.8 cm (120.0 in.)—
Length of Track on Ground219.5 cm (86.4 in.)402.3 cm (158.4 in.)
Track Gauge167.6 cm (66.0 in.)134.1 cm (52.8 in.)
Ground Clearance39.6 cm (15.6 in.)33.5 cm (13.2 in.)
No of Track Rollers Per Side65
Shoe Size60.2 cm (23.7 in.)35.8 cm (14.1 in.)
Weight (Operating)6930.0 kg (15278.1 lbs)6546.0 kg (14431.5 lbs)
Track Pitch15.5 cm (6.1 in.)—
Pump Flow—83.3 LPM (22 GPM)
Net Power—47.0 kW (63 HP)
Max Torque—252.0 N-m (185.9 lbs/ft)
Torque Measured RPM—1200 RPM
Max Speed Forward—10.1 km/h (6.3 mph)
Max Speed Reverse—11.1 km/h (6.9 mph)
Fuel Capacity—104.5 l (27.6 gal)
Engine Oil Capacity—10.6 l (2.8 gal)
Cooling System Capacity—15.9 l (4.2 gal)
Hydraulic Capacity—32.6 l (8.6 gal)
Final Drives Capacity—6.1 l (1.6 gal)
Hydraulic Pump Flow—83.3 LPM (22 GPM)
Relief Valve Pressure—172.4 bar (2500 psi)
No of Carrier Rollers Per Side—1
No of Shoes Per Side—36

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons