SPECS / COMPARISON
Kobelco SK850LC-9 vs Hitachi ZAXIS870H
A detailed comparison of the Kobelco SK850LC-9 and the Hitachi ZAXIS870H. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Kobelco SK850LC-9380 kW (510 HP)
Hitachi ZAXIS870H397 kW (532 HP)
Weight
Kobelco SK850LC-982600 kg (182102 lbs)
Hitachi ZAXIS870H82100 kg (181000 lbs)
Operating Weight
Kobelco SK850LC-982600 kg (182102 lbs)
Hitachi ZAXIS870H82100 kg (181000 lbs)
| Specification | Kobelco SK850LC-9 Large Excavators | Hitachi ZAXIS870H Large Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Large Excavator | Large Excavator |
| Weight | 82600 kg (182102 lbs) | 82100 kg (181000 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 380 kW (510 HP) | 397 kW (532 HP) |
| Digging Depth | 832 cm (328 in.) | 716 cm (282 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 832 cm (328 in.) | 716 cm (282 in.) |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 1319.8 cm (519.6 in.) | 1204.0 cm (474.0 in.) |
| Max Digging Reach | 1350.3 cm (531.6 in.) | — |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | 493.8 cm (194.4 in.) | 411.5 cm (162.0 in.) |
| Overall Length | 1.190 cm (472 in) | — |
| Ground Clearance | 88.4 cm (34.8 in.) | 91.4 cm (36.0 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | 457.2 cm (180.0 in.) | 460.2 cm (181.2 in.) |
| Min swing radius | 6888.5 cm (2712.0 in.) | — |
| Overall Width Upper Structure | 368.8 cm (145.2 in.) | — |
| Net Power | 380 kW (510 HP) | 397 kW (532 HP) |
| Gross Power | 388.7 kW (521.3 HP) | 405.1 kW (543.3 HP) |
| Rated Power | 1800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | 856.3 l (226.2 gal) | 790.0 l (208.7 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | 330 Bar (4786 psi) | 343 Bar (4975 psi) |
| Operating Weight | 82600 kg (182102 lbs) | 82100 kg (181000 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 4.3 km (2.7 mph) | 4.2 km (2.6 mph) |
| Swing Speed | 7.3 RPM | 7.3 RPM |
| Cab Height | 365.8 cm (144.0 in.) | 381.0 cm (150.0 in.) |
| Cooling system | Water Cooled | — |
| Max Torque | 2120.1 Nm (1563.7 ft-lbs) | 2250.1 Nm (1659.6 ft-lbs) |
| Cooling Capacity | 74.2 l (19.6 gal) | 116.2 l (30.7 gal) |
| Fuel Capacity | 960.4 l (253.7 gal) | 1120.1 l (295.9 gal) |
| Engine Oil Capacity | 54.1 l (14.3 gal) | 57.2 l (15.1 gal) |
| Operating Voltage | Operating Voltage 24 V | Operating Voltage 24 V |
| Ground Pressure | 97.2 kPa (14.1 psi) | 131.0 kPa (19.0 psi) |
| Bore | 13.7 cm (5.4 in) | — |
| Max Dumping Clearance | 844.3 cm (332.4 in.) | — |
| Min Dumping Clearance | 432.8 cm (170.4 in.) | — |
| Bucket Digging Force | 39.259 kg (86551.5 lbs) | — |
| Bucket Digging Force(SAE) | 44.052 kg (97117.5 lbs) | — |
| Bucket Digging Force(ISO) | 41.095 kg (90598 lbs) | — |
| Arm Crowd Force(ISO) | 35.792 kg (78908 lbs) | — |
| Arm Crowd Force(SAE) | 30.592 kg (67442.7 lbs) | — |
| Arm Crowd Force | 34.467 kg (75985.5 lbs) | — |
| Number of Shoes per Side | 51 | 47 |
| Displacement | 12913.0 cc (788 cu. in.) | 15682.4 cc (957 cu. in.) |
| Max Cutting Height | 1237.5 cm (487.2 in.) | 1204.0 cm (474.0 in.) |
| Alternator | 60 A | 50 A |
| Hydraulic Pump Type | Pump Type Three variable displacement pumps and one gear pump | — |
| Track Gauge | 359.7 cm (141.6 in.) | 347.5 cm (136.8 in.) |
| Torque Power | 1350 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Drawbar Pull | 64.957 kg (143203.3 lbs) | — |
| Gradeability | 0.7 | — |
| Battery | 2 x 12 V | — |
| Max Loading Height | — | 813.8 cm (320.4 in.) |
| Track Length | — | 5516.9 cm (2172.0 in.) |
| Length of Track on Ground | — | 460.2 cm (181.2 in.) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | — | 3.5 m2 (4.6 cu yds) |
| Max Bucket Capacity | — | 4.4 m2 (5.7 cu yds) |
| Min Bucket Capacity | — | 1.9 m2 (2.5 cu yds) |
| Overall Width | — | 411.5 cm (162.0 in.) |
| Engine Make | — | Isuzu |
| Engine Model | — | AH-6WG1XYSA-03 |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | — | 1.056 LPM (279 GPM) |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Swing Drive Capacity | — | 15.1 l (4.0 gal) |
| Number of Carrier Rollers per Side | — | 3 |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | — | 8 |
| Shoe Size | — | 65.0 cm (25.6 in.) |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | — | 170.7 cm (67.2 in.) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.