SPECS / COMPARISON
John Deere 800C vs Komatsu PC750-6
A detailed comparison of the John Deere 800C and the Komatsu PC750-6. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
John Deere 800C339 kW (454 HP)
Komatsu PC750-6339 kW (454 HP)
Weight
John Deere 800C76448 kg (168540 lbs)
Komatsu PC750-675020 kg (165390 lbs)
Operating Weight
John Deere 800C76448 kg (168540 lbs)
Komatsu PC750-675020 kg (165390 lbs)
| Specification | John Deere 800C Large Excavators | Komatsu PC750-6 Large Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Large Excavator | Large Excavator |
| Weight | 76448 kg (168540 lbs) | 75020 kg (165390 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 339 kW (454 HP) | 339 kW (454 HP) |
| Digging Depth | 899 cm (354 in.) | 847 cm (334 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 899 cm (354 in.) | 847 cm (334 in.) |
| Max Loading Height | 862.6 cm (339.6 in.) | 816.9 cm (321.6 in.) |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 1380.7 cm (543.6 in.) | 1338.1 cm (526.8 in.) |
| Max Digging Reach | 883.9 cm (348.0 in.) | 1036.3 cm (408.0 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | 789.4 cm (310.8 in.) | 627.9 cm (247.2 in.) |
| Overall Length | 1432.6 cm (564.0 in.) | 1411.2 cm (555.6 in.) |
| Track Length | 6126.5 cm (2412.0 in.) | 5395.0 cm (2124.0 in.) |
| Length of Track on Ground | 512.1 cm (201.6 in.) | 451.1 cm (177.6 in.) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | 3.6 m2 (4.7 cu yds) | 4.5 m2 (5.9 cu yds) |
| Max Bucket Capacity | 7.4 m2 (9.7 cu yds) | 4.5 m2 (5.9 cu yds) |
| Min Bucket Capacity | 2.0 m2 (2.6 cu yds) | 3.8 m2 (5.0 cu yds) |
| Ground Clearance | 91.4 cm (36.0 in.) | 85.3 cm (33.6 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | 408.4 cm (160.8 in.) | 432.8 cm (170.4 in.) |
| Overall Width | 438.9 cm (172.8 in.) | 411.5 cm (162.0 in.) |
| Engine Make | Isuzu | Komatsu |
| Engine Model | BB-6WG1T | SAA6D140E-2 |
| Net Power | 339 kW (454 HP) | 339 kW (454 HP) |
| Gross Power | 347.0 kW (465.3 HP) | 331 kw (444 hp) |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | 503 LPM (133 GPM) | 1.014 LPM (268.2 GPM) |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | 363.4 l (96.0 gal) | 440.2 l (116.3 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | 319 Bar (4620 psi) | 314 Bar (4550 psi) |
| Operating Weight | 76448 kg (168540 lbs) | 75020 kg (165390 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 4.3 km (2.7 mph) | 4.3 km (2.7 mph) |
| Swing Speed | 8.2 RPM | 5.7 RPM |
| Cab Height | 353.6 cm (139.2 in.) | 353.6 cm (139.2 in.) |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged with cooler | Turbocharged |
| Max Torque | 1857.5 Nm (1370.0 ft-lbs) | — |
| Cooling Capacity | 66.2 l (17.5 gal) | 85.2 l (22.5 gal) |
| Fuel Capacity | 900.9 l (238.0 gal) | 880.1 l (232.5 gal) |
| Swing Drive Capacity | 12.5 l (3.3 gal) | — |
| Engine Oil Capacity | 49.2 l (13.0 gal) | 38.2 l (10.1 gal) |
| Operating Voltage | Operating Voltage 24 V | — |
| Ground Pressure | 73.8 kPa (10.7 psi) | 115.8 kPa (16.8 psi) |
| Number of Carrier Rollers per Side | 3 | — |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | 9 | — |
| Number of Shoes per Side | 51 | — |
| Displacement | 15682.4 cc (957 cu. in.) | 15241.6 cc (930 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | 91.4 cm (36.0 in.) | 61.2 cm (24.1 in.) |
| Max Cutting Height | 1252.7 cm (493.2 in.) | 1152.1 cm (453.6 in.) |
| Alternator | 50 A | — |
| Track Gauge | 347.5 cm (136.8 in.) | 280.4 cm (110.4 in.) |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | 161.5 cm (63.6 in.) | 158.5 cm (62.4 in.) |
| Drawbar Pull | 57.241 kg (126194 lbs) | — |
| Overall Length with Shovel | — | 978.4 cm (385.2 in.) |
| Upper Structure Ground Clearance | — | 158.5 cm (62.4 in.) |
| Loading Shovel Shoe Width | — | 734.6 cm (289.2 in.) |
| Rated Power | — | 1800 RPM |
| Loading Shovel Operating Weight | — | 74.580 kg (164420 lbs) |
| Height to Top of Boom | — | 478.5 cm (188.4 in.) |
| Height to Top of Boom(Shovel) | — | 509.0 cm (200.4 in.) |
| Loading Shovel Ground Pressure | — | 118.6 kPa (17.2 psi) |
| Max Dumping Height | — | 759.0 cm (298.8 in.) |
| Arm Crowd Force | — | 33811.1 kg (74516 lbs) |
| No of Cylinders | — | 6 |
| Number of Lower Rollers | — | 8 |
| Number of Upper Rollers | — | 3 |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.