Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Hyundai ROBEX 35Z-9A vs Caterpillar 303E CR

A detailed comparison of the Hyundai ROBEX 35Z-9A and the Caterpillar 303E CR. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Hyundai ROBEX 35Z-9A17 kW (23 HP)
Caterpillar 303E CR17 kW (23 HP)
Weight
Hyundai ROBEX 35Z-9A3550 kg (7827 lbs)
Caterpillar 303E CR3530 kg (7782 lbs)
Operating Weight
Hyundai ROBEX 35Z-9A3550 kg (7827 lbs)
Caterpillar 303E CR3530 kg (7782 lbs)
SpecificationHyundai ROBEX 35Z-9AHyundai ROBEX 35Z-9AMini ExcavatorsCaterpillar 303E CRCaterpillar 303E CRMini Excavators
Excavator TypeMini ExcavatorMini Excavator
Weight3550 kg (7827 lbs)3530 kg (7782 lbs)
Horsepower17 kW (23 HP)17 kW (23 HP)
Digging Depth314 cm (124 in.)274 cm (108 in.)
Max Digging Depth314 cm (124 in.)274 cm (108 in.)
Max Loading Height344.4 cm (135.6 in.)—
Max Reach Along Ground521.2 cm (205.2 in.)481.6 cm (189.6 in.)
Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth219.5 cm (86.4 in.)—
Track Length5760.7 cm (2268.0 in.)—
Length of Track on Ground481.6 cm (189.6 in.)—
Ground Clearance30.5 cm (12.0 in.)—
Tail Swing Radius88.4 cm (34.8 in.)—
Overall Width106.7 cm (42.0 in.)—
Engine MakeYanmarCaterpillar
Engine Model3 TNV88FC13
Net Power17 kW (23 HP)17 kW (23 HP)
Gross Power18 kw (24.4 hp)18 kw (24.8 hp)
Rated Power2200 RPM—
Hydraulic System Capacity37.1 l (9.8 gal)—
Operating Weight3550 kg (7827 lbs)3530 kg (7782 lbs)
Max Travel Speed4.3 km (2.7 mph)4.5 km (2.8 mph)
Cab Height253.0 cm (99.6 in.)—
Max Torque135.6 Nm (100.0 ft-lbs)—
Cooling Capacity5.7 l (1.5 gal)—
Fuel Capacity40.1 l (10.6 gal)—
Engine Oil Capacity6.8 l (1.8 gal)—
Operating VoltageOperating Voltage 12 V—
Displacement1638.7 cc (100 cu. in.)1261.8 cc (77 cu. in.)
Max Cutting Height481.6 cm (189.6 in.)—
Drawbar Pull3.100 kg (6835 lbs)—
Swing Speed—Machine 9 RPM
Blade Height—33 cm (13 in)
Blade Lift Height—41 cm (16 in.)
Stroke—8.9 cm (3.5 in)
Bore—7.9 cm (3.1 in)
Boom Swing(Left)—80 °

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons