Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Farmall Regular vs Case 530

A detailed comparison of the Farmall Regular and the Case 530. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Weight
Farmall Regular1815.0 kg (4001.4 lbs)
Case 5301820.0 kg (4012.4 lbs)
SpecificationFarmall RegularFarmall RegularAgricultural TractorsCase 530Case 530Agricultural Tractors
Tractor TypeRow-Crop TractorUtility Tractor
Weight1815.0 kg (4001.4 lbs)1820.0 kg (4012.4 lbs)
Length345.0 cm (135.8 in.)330.0 cm (129.9 in.)
Years Made1924-19321960-1969
Engine ModelInternational HarvesterJ.I. Case
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeGasolineDiesel
Cylinders44
Displacement3622 cc (221.0 cu in.)3087 cc (188.4 cu in.)
Bore9.50 cm (3.74 in.)9.70 cm (3.82 in.)
Stroke12.70 cm (5.00 in.)10.49 cm (4.13 in.)
Rear PTO TypeTransmissionTransmission or independent
Rear PTO Speed535 RPM540 RPM
StarterElectricElectric
Height170.0 cm (66.9 in.)134.0 cm (52.8 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity49.2 l (13.0 gal)83.3 l (22.0 gal)
Coolant Capacity34.1 l (9.0 gal)15.6 l (4.1 gal)
Gears3 forward and 1 reverse8 forward and 8 reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed4.4 km/h (Forward: 4.0 MPH (6.4 km/h) Reverse: 2.7 MPH)5.3 km/h (Forward: 13.4 MPH (21.6 km/h) Reverse: 3.3 MPH)
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypeManual with automatic engagement of turning brakesManual
Front TiresAg: 25×4 steelLawn/turf: 25×8 steelAg: 5.50-16Ag: 6.00×16, 6.00×14, 7.50×15
Rear TiresAg: 40×6 steelLawn/turf: 40×16 steelAg: 12.4-28Ag: 12.4×24, 13.6×28, 14.9×28, 14.9×24, 16.9×24
Horsepower—29.8 kW (39.9 HP)
Transmission Type—Mechanical shuttle with dry disc clutch
Compression Ratio—17.5:1
Wheelbase—207.0 cm (81.5 in.)
Ground Clearance—46.0 cm (18.1 in.)
Oil Capacity—4.7 l (1.2 gal)
Transmission Model—Dual-Range Shuttle
Brakes—Mechanical disc
Drawbar Category—I
Hitch Type—Position control

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons