Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Farmall 130 vs Ford 9N

A detailed comparison of the Farmall 130 and the Ford 9N. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Weight
Farmall 1301270.0 kg (2799.9 lbs)
Ford 9N1315.0 kg (2899.1 lbs)
SpecificationFarmall 130Farmall 130Agricultural TractorsFord 9NFord 9NAgricultural Tractors
Tractor TypeRow-Crop TractorUtility Tractor
Weight1270.0 kg (2799.9 lbs)1315.0 kg (2899.1 lbs)
Transmission TypeSliding gear with dry disc clutchSliding gear
Length271.0 cm (106.7 in.)292.0 cm (115.0 in.)
Years Made1956-19581936-1942
Engine ModelInternational Harvester C-123Ford
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders44
Displacement2011 cc (122.7 cu in.)1961 cc (119.7 cu in.)
Bore7.90 cm (3.11 in.)8.10 cm (3.19 in.)
Stroke10.21 cm (4.02 in.)9.50 cm (3.74 in.)
Rear PTO Speed540 RPM545 RPM
Compression Ratio6.8:16.0:1
Battery12 V6 V 85Ah
StarterElectricElectric
Height165.0 cm (Steering Wheel Height: 65.0 in.)132.0 cm (52.0 in.)
Wheelbase180.0 cm (70.9 in.)177.0 cm (69.7 in.)
Ground Clearance68.0 cm (21.7 in. (55.0 cm) High crop: 26.8 in.)—
Fuel Tank Capacity41.6 l (11.0 gal)38.0 l (10.0 gal)
Oil Capacity4.7 l (1.2 gal)5.7 l (1.5 gal)
Coolant Capacity14.2 l (3.8 gal)11.4 l (3.0 gal)
Gears4 forward and 1 reverse3 forward and 1 reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed4.7 km/h (Forward: 10.0 MPH (16.1 km/h) Reverse: 2.9 MPH)7.0 km/h (Forward: 11.7 MPH (18.9 km/h) Reverse: 4.3 MPH)
BrakesDifferential mechanical contracting bandDifferential mechanical shoe
Drawbar CategoryIH Fast-HitchI
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypeManualManual
Front TiresAg: 5.00×15Ag: 4.00-19
Rear TiresAg: 9.00×24Ag: 8.00-32
Horsepower—17.2 kW (23.1 HP)
Lift Capacity—362.0 kg (798.1 lbs)
Rear PTO Type—Transmission
Torque Speed—113.9 N·m (84.0 lb-ft)
Transmission Oil Capacity—18.9 l (5.0 gal)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons