Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Doosan S030 vs Kubota U25

A detailed comparison of the Doosan S030 and the Kubota U25. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Doosan S03015 kW (20 HP)
Kubota U2515 kW (20 HP)
Weight
Doosan S0302840 kg (6261 lbs)
Kubota U252551 kg (5625 lbs)
Operating Weight
Doosan S0302840 kg (6261 lbs)
Kubota U252551 kg (5625 lbs)
SpecificationDoosan S030Doosan S030Mini ExcavatorsKubota U25Kubota U25Mini Excavators
Excavator TypeMini ExcavatorMini Excavator
Weight2840 kg (6261 lbs)2551 kg (5625 lbs)
Horsepower15 kW (20 HP)15 kW (20 HP)
Digging Depth259 cm (102 in.)281 cm (111 in.)
Max Digging Depth259 cm (102 in.)281 cm (111 in.)
Max Loading Height286.5 cm (112.8 in.)—
Overall Length442.0 cm (174.0 in.)—
Track Length1737.4 cm (684.0 in.)—
Length of Track on Ground146.3 cm (57.6 in.)—
Reference Bucket Capacity0.1 m2 (0.1 cu yds)—
Tail Swing Radius137.2 cm (54.0 in.)—
Overall Width149.4 cm (58.8 in.)152.4 cm (60.0 in.)
Engine MakeIsuzuKubota
Engine Model3 LBID1105
Net Power15 kW (20 HP)15 kW (20 HP)
Gross Power16.5 kW (22.1 HP)16.5 kW (22.1 HP)
Rated Power2000 RPM2400 RPM
Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity61 LPM (16.2 GPM)76 LPM (20.3 GPM)
Hydraulic System Capacity55.3 l (14.6 gal)22.0 l (5.8 gal)
Relief Valve Pressure172 Bar (2491 psi)—
Operating Weight2840 kg (6261 lbs)2551 kg (5625 lbs)
Max Travel Speed4.0 km (2.5 mph)4.7 km (2.9 mph)
Swing Speed8.8 RPM9.8 RPM
Cab Height234.7 cm (92.4 in.)—
Fuel Capacity42.8 l (11.3 gal)28.0 l (7.4 gal)
Displacement1124.2 cc (69 cu. in.)1122.5 cc (69 cu. in.)
Shoe Size30.2 cm (11.9 in.)—
Max Cutting Height420.6 cm (165.6 in.)—
Track Gauge118.9 cm (46.8 in.)—
Max Reach Along Ground—467.3 cm (184.0 in.)
Ground Clearance—30.5 cm (12.0 in.)
Aspiration—Liquid-cooled
Cooling Capacity—3.8 l (1.0 gal)
Engine Oil Capacity—4.5 l (1.2 gal)
Ground Pressure—23.4 kPa (3.4 psi)
No of Cylinders—3
Drawbar Pull—3.060 kg (6745 lbs)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons