Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet XT1 LT42 vs Sabre 1842GV

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet XT1 LT42 and the Sabre 1842GV. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet XT1 LT4213.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Sabre 1842GV13.4 kW (18.0 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet XT1 LT42Cub Cadet XT1 LT42Garden and Lawn TractorsSabre 1842GVSabre 1842GVGarden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeLawn TractorLawn Tractor
Horsepower13.4 kW (18.0 HP)13.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Weight185.0 kg (407.9 lbs)—
Transmission TypeBelt-driven hydrostaticBelt-driven gear
Length172.0 cm (67.7 in.)181.0 cm (71.3 in.)
Years Made2015-Present1997-2000
Engine ModelKohler SV541Briggs & Stratton 350777
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, inline4-stroke, air-cooled, V
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders12
Displacement596 cc (36.4 cu in.)568 cc (34.7 cu in.)
Bore9.40 cm (3.70 in.)7.19 cm (2.83 in.)
Stroke8.61 cm (3.39 in.)7.01 cm (2.76 in.)
Rear PTO TypeIndependent with manual clutch—
Rated RPM3600 RPM3600 RPM
Compression Ratio8.5:1—
Spark PlugChampion RC12YC—
Battery12 V12 V
StarterElectricElectric
Height107.0 cm (42.1 in.)112.0 cm (44.1 in.)
Wheelbase119.0 cm (46.9 in.)123.0 cm (48.4 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity11.4 l (3.0 gal)13.0 l (3.4 gal)
Oil Capacity1.2 l (0.3 gal)1.7 l (0.4 gal)
Engine Oil TypeSAE: 10W-30, 5W-20, 5W-30API: SG, SH, SJ or higher—
Transmission ModelTuff Torq K46—
GearsInfinite forward and reverse6 forward and 1 reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed5.0 km/h (Forward: 5.5 MPH (8.8 km/h) Reverse: 3.1 MPH)4.7 km/h (Forward: 6.1 MPH (9.8 km/h) Reverse: 2.9 MPH)
BrakesDisc—
Cabin TypeOpen operator station.Open operator station
Steering TypeManualManual
Front TiresLawn/turf: 15×6—
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 20×8—
Front PTO Type—Independent with electric clutch
Width—95.0 cm (37.4 in.)
Transmission Oil Capacity—3.2 l (0.8 gal)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons