SPECS / COMPARISON
Cub Cadet 70 vs Toro 8-25 56133
A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 70 and the Toro 8-25 56133. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Cub Cadet 705.2 kW (7.0 HP)
Toro 8-25 561336.0 kW (8.1 HP)
| Specification | Cub Cadet 70 Garden and Lawn Tractors | Toro 8-25 56133 Garden and Lawn Tractors |
|---|---|---|
| Tractor Main Category | Garden and Lawn Care Tractors | Garden and Lawn Care Tractors |
| Tractor Type | Garden Tractor | Riding Mower Tractor |
| Horsepower | 5.2 kW (7.0 HP) | 6.0 kW (8.1 HP) |
| Transmission Type | Creeper | Belt-driven gear |
| Years Made | 1963-1965 | 1991-1992 |
| Engine Model | Kohler K161 | Briggs & Stratton 191707 |
| Engine Type | 4-stroke, air-cooled | 4-stroke, air-cooled |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Displacement | 266 cc (16.2 cu in.) | 318 cc (19.4 cu in.) |
| Bore | 7.29 cm (2.87 in.) | 7.59 cm (2.99 in.) |
| Stroke | 6.35 cm (2.50 in.) | 7.01 cm (2.76 in.) |
| Rear PTO Type | Transmission | — |
| Rated RPM | 3600 RPM | — |
| Spark Plug | Champion RJ8C | — |
| Battery | 12 V | 12 V |
| Starter | Electric | Electric |
| Height | 101.0 cm (39.8 in.) | 96.0 cm (Steering Wheel Height: 37.8 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 109.0 cm (42.9 in.) | 104.0 cm (40.9 in.) |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 4.7 l (1.2 gal) | 3.8 l (1.0 gal) |
| Gears | 6 forward and 2 reverse | 5 forward and 1 reverse |
| Chassis | 4×2 2WD | 4×2 2WD |
| Brakes | Dry disc | — |
| Cabin Type | Open operator station | Open operator station |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual |
| Front Tires | Lawn/turf: 4.80×4.00-8, 16×6.50-8 | Lawn/turf: 11×4.00-5 |
| Rear Tires | Lawn/turf: 6-12, 8-12 | Lawn/turf: 13×5.00-6 |
| Weight | — | 138.0 kg (304.2 lbs) |
| Length | — | 132.0 cm (52.0 in.) |
| Middle PTO Type | — | Independent |
| Transmission Model | — | Peerless |
| Max. Travel Speed | — | 1.9 km/h (Forward: 3.7 MPH (6.0 km/h) Reverse: 1.2 MPH) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.