Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 2182 vs Cub Cadet 2072

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 2182 and the Cub Cadet 2072. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 218215.7 kW (21.1 HP)
Cub Cadet 207214.9 kW (20.0 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet 2182Cub Cadet 2182Garden and Lawn TractorsCub Cadet 2072Cub Cadet 2072Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeLawn TractorGarden Tractor
Horsepower15.7 kW (21.1 HP)14.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Weight516.0 kg (1137.6 lbs)—
Transmission TypeShaft-driven hydrostaticShaft-driven hydrostatic
Length199.0 cm (78.3 in.)199.0 cm (78.3 in.)
Years Made1990-19951987-1989
Engine ModelKubotaKohler M20S
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, air-cooled
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders32
Displacement600 cc (36.6 cu in.)770 cc (47.0 cu in.)
Bore6.40 cm (2.52 in.)7.90 cm (3.11 in.)
Stroke6.20 cm (2.44 in.)7.80 cm (3.07 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutch—
Battery12 V, CCA 440A12 V
StarterElectricElectric
Height120.0 cm (47.2 in.)120.0 cm (47.2 in.)
Wheelbase131.0 cm (51.6 in.)131.0 cm (51.6 in.)
Ground Clearance19.0 cm (7.5 in.)19.0 cm (7.5 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity18.9 l (5.0 gal)15.1 l (4.0 gal)
Oil Capacity2.9 l (0.8 gal)1.8 l (0.5 gal)
Coolant Capacity3.8 l (1.0 gal)—
Transmission ModelSundstrand—
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)
BrakesDiscDual disc
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypePowerPower
Front TiresLawn/turf: 18×8.5-8Lawn/turf: 18×8.50-8
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 26×12-12Lawn/turf: 26×12.00-12
Spark Plug—Chamption RBL-15Y
Transmission Oil Capacity—6.6 l (1.7 gal)
Engine Oil Type—SAE 10W-30, 30
Drawbar Category—0

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons