Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 2082 vs Cub Cadet 2206

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 2082 and the Cub Cadet 2206. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 208214.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Cub Cadet 220614.9 kW (20.0 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet 2082Cub Cadet 2082Garden and Lawn TractorsCub Cadet 2206Cub Cadet 2206Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeLawn TractorGarden Tractor
Horsepower14.9 kW (20.0 HP)14.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Weight458.0 kg (1009.7 lbs)—
Transmission TypeShaft-driven hydrostaticShaft-driven hydrostatic
Length199.0 cm (78.3 in.)182.0 cm (71.7 in.)
Years Made1990-19932000-2002
Engine ModelKohler M20SKohler Command
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, V-twin4-stroke, air-cooled
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement770 cc (47.0 cu in.)624 cc (38.1 cu in.)
Bore7.90 cm (3.11 in.)7.70 cm (3.03 in.)
Stroke7.80 cm (3.07 in.)6.71 cm (2.64 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutchIndependent with electric clutch
Spark PlugChampion RV15YC—
Battery12 V, CCA 500A12 V, CCA 275A
StarterElectricElectric
Height120.0 cm (47.2 in.)109.0 cm (42.9 in.)
Wheelbase131.0 cm (51.6 in.)119.0 cm (46.9 in.)
Ground Clearance19.0 cm (7.5 in.)15.0 cm (5.9 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity18.9 l (5.0 gal)7.9 l (2.1 gal)
Oil Capacity2.6 l (0.7 gal)1.9 l (0.5 gal)
Transmission Oil Capacity6.6 l (1.7 gal)5.7 l (1.5 gal)
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)4.8 km/h (Forward: 6.0 MPH (9.7 km/h) Reverse: 3.0 MPH)
BrakesDual discInternal expanding
Drawbar Category0—
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Front TiresLawn/turf: 18×8.50-8Lawn/turf: 16×6.5-8
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 26×12.00-12Lawn/turf: 23×9.5-12
Rated RPM—3600 RPM
Steering Type—Manual

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons