Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 1282 vs Simplicity 4212

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 1282 and the Simplicity 4212. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 12828.9 kW (11.9 HP)
Simplicity 42128.9 kW (11.9 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet 1282Cub Cadet 1282Garden and Lawn TractorsSimplicity 4212Simplicity 4212Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeLawn TractorLawn Tractor
Horsepower8.9 kW (11.9 HP)8.9 kW (11.9 HP)
Weight298.0 kg (657.0 lbs)—
Transmission TypeHydrostaticBelt-driven hydrostatic
Length182.0 cm (71.7 in.)160.0 cm (63.0 in.)
Years Made1982-19851987-1989
Engine ModelKohler K301Briggs & Stratton
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, inline4-stroke, air-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders11
Displacement476 cc (29.0 cu in.)468 cc (28.6 cu in.)
Bore8.61 cm (3.39 in.)8.71 cm (3.43 in.)
Stroke8.31 cm (3.27 in.)7.80 cm (3.07 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutch—
Torque Power2100 RPM—
Torque Speed29.8 N·m (22.0 lb-ft)—
Rated RPM2200 RPM3600 RPM
Battery12 V, CCA 200A, 32Ah12 V
StarterElectricElectric
Height109.0 cm (42.9 in.)100.0 cm (Steering Wheel Height: 39.4 in.)
Wheelbase111.0 cm (43.7 in.)115.0 cm (45.3 in.)
Ground Clearance15.0 cm (5.9 in.)15.0 cm (Front axle: 8.7 in. (22.0 cm) Rear axle: 5.9 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity15.0 l (4.0 gal)8.3 l (2.2 gal)
Transmission ModelSundstrand—
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed6.4 km/h (Forward: 8.0 MPH (12.9 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)4.8 km/h (Forward: 4.7 MPH (7.6 km/h) Reverse: 3.0 MPH)
BrakesWet disc—
Drawbar Category0—
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypeManualManual
Front TiresLawn/turf: 16×16.50-8Lawn/turf: 15×6.00-6
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 23×10.50-12Lawn/turf: 18×8.50-8
Width—86.0 cm (33.9 in.)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons