SPECS / COMPARISON
Cub Cadet 1027 vs Honda HT-R3009
A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 1027 and the Honda HT-R3009. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Cub Cadet 10276.7 kW (9.0 HP)
Honda HT-R30096.3 kW (8.5 HP)
Weight
Cub Cadet 1027193.0 kg (425.5 lbs)
Honda HT-R3009165.0 kg (363.8 lbs)
| Specification | Cub Cadet 1027 Garden and Lawn Tractors | Honda HT-R3009 Garden and Lawn Tractors |
|---|---|---|
| Tractor Main Category | Garden and Lawn Care Tractors | Garden and Lawn Care Tractors |
| Tractor Type | Riding Mower Tractor | Riding Mower Tractor |
| Horsepower | 6.7 kW (9.0 HP) | 6.3 kW (8.5 HP) |
| Weight | 193.0 kg (425.5 lbs) | 165.0 kg (363.8 lbs) |
| Transmission Type | Hydrostatic | Belt-driven gear type |
| Years Made | 2000-2002 | 1985-1988 |
| Engine Model | Briggs & Stratton | Honda GXV270 |
| Engine Type | 4-stroke, air-cooled, inline | 4-stroke, air-cooled |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Displacement | 399 cc (24.3 cu in.) | 270 cc (16.5 cu in.) |
| Battery | 12 V | 12 V |
| Starter | Electric | Electric |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 3.8 l (1.0 gal) | 1.9 l (0.5 gal) |
| Gears | Infinite forward and reverse | 5 forward and 1 reverse |
| Chassis | 4×2 2WD | 4×2 2WD |
| Cabin Type | Open operator station | Open operator station |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual |
| Front Tires | Lawn/turf: 11×4 | Lawn/turf: 11×4.00-5 |
| Rear Tires | Lawn/turf: 16×6.5 | Lawn/turf: 16×6.50-8 |
| Length | — | 150.0 cm (59.1 in.) |
| Bore | — | 7.70 cm (3.03 in.) |
| Stroke | — | 5.79 cm (2.28 in.) |
| Middle PTO Type | — | Independent with manual clutch |
| Rated RPM | — | 3600 RPM |
| Spark Plug | — | NGK BPR5ES |
| Height | — | 100.0 cm (Steering Wheel Height: 39.4 in.) |
| Wheelbase | — | 109.0 cm (42.9 in.) |
| Oil Capacity | — | 1.1 l (0.3 gal) |
| Engine Oil Type | — | SAE 10W-30, 10W-40 |
| Max. Travel Speed | — | 2.7 km/h (Forward: 4.9 MPH (7.9 km/h) Reverse: 1.7 MPH) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.