Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 102 vs Raven MPV-7100

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 102 and the Raven MPV-7100. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 1027.5 kW (10.1 HP)
Raven MPV-71008.9 kW (11.9 HP)
Weight
Cub Cadet 102353.0 kg (778.2 lbs)
Raven MPV-7100335.0 kg (738.5 lbs)
SpecificationCub Cadet 102Cub Cadet 102Garden and Lawn TractorsRaven MPV-7100Raven MPV-7100Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeGarden TractorGarden Tractor
Horsepower7.5 kW (10.1 HP)8.9 kW (11.9 HP)
Weight353.0 kg (778.2 lbs)335.0 kg (738.5 lbs)
Transmission TypeCreeperElectric-drive
Length160.0 cm (63.0 in.)193.0 cm (76.0 in.)
Years Made1965-19672013-Present
Engine ModelKohler K241ASRATO
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, inline4-stroke, air-cooled
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders11
Displacement391 cc (23.9 cu in.)420 cc (25.6 cu in.)
Bore8.26 cm (3.25 in.)—
Stroke7.29 cm (2.87 in.)—
Rear PTO TypeTransmission—
Front PTO TypeIndependent—
Rated RPM3600 RPM—
Compression Ratio7.0:1—
Spark PlugChampion RH10Torch F7TC
Battery12 V12 V , 48V
StarterElectricElectric
Height101.0 cm (39.8 in.)127.0 cm (50.0 in.)
Wheelbase109.0 cm (42.9 in.)111.0 cm (43.7 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity6.2 l (1.6 gal)17.0 l (4.5 gal)
Oil Capacity1.2 l (0.3 gal)1.1 l (0.3 gal)
Engine Oil TypeAPI SF or SGSAE 10W-30
Gears6 forward and 2 reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×4 4WD
Max. Travel Speed1.0 km/h (Forward: 1.7 MPH (2.7 km/h) Reverse: 0.6 MPH)9.7 km/h (Forward: 15.0 MPH (24.1 km/h) Reverse: 6.0 MPH)
BrakesDry disc—
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypeManualManual
Front TiresLawn/turf: 4.80×4.00-8, 16×6.50-8Lawn/turf: 18×8.5-8
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 6-12, 23×8.50-12Lawn/turf: 20×8-10
Middle PTO Type—Independent
Width—109.0 cm (42.9 in.)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons