Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Craftsman DGS6500 vs Cub Cadet XT2 GX54 KH

A detailed comparison of the Craftsman DGS6500 and the Cub Cadet XT2 GX54 KH. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Craftsman DGS650019.4 kW (26.0 HP)
Cub Cadet XT2 GX54 KH19.4 kW (26.0 HP)
Weight
Craftsman DGS6500267.0 kg (588.6 lbs)
Cub Cadet XT2 GX54 KH258.0 kg (568.8 lbs)
SpecificationCraftsman DGS6500Craftsman DGS6500Garden and Lawn TractorsCub Cadet XT2 GX54 KHCub Cadet XT2 GX54 KHGarden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeGarden TractorLawn Tractor
Horsepower19.4 kW (26.0 HP)19.4 kW (26.0 HP)
Weight267.0 kg (588.6 lbs)258.0 kg (568.8 lbs)
Transmission TypeBelt-driven hydrostaticBelt-driven hydrostatic
Years Made20082015-
Engine ModelKohler SV735Kohler KT745
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, V-twin4-stroke, air-cooled, V-twin
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement725 cc (44.2 cu in.)747 cc (45.6 cu in.)
Bore8.31 cm (3.27 in.)8.41 cm (3.31 in.)
Stroke6.71 cm (2.64 in.)6.91 cm (2.72 in.)
Rated RPM3600 RPM—
Compression Ratio9.0:1—
Spark PlugChampion RC12YC—
Battery12 V, CCA 280A, Group U1R12 V, CCA 300A
StarterElectricElectric
Fuel Tank Capacity15.1 l (4.0 gal)11.5 l (3.0 gal)
Oil Capacity1.8 l (0.5 gal)2.0 l (0.5 gal)
Transmission ModelTuff Torq K-66YTuff Torq K58
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed3.4 km/h (Forward: 5.8 MPH (9.3 km/h) Reverse: 2.1 MPH)5.0 km/h (Forward: 5.5 MPH (8.8 km/h) Reverse: 3.1 MPH)
BrakesMechanical discDisc
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypeManual sector and pinionManual
Front TiresLawn/turf: 16×6.5×6Lawn/turf: 16×6.5
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 23×10.5×8Lawn/turf: 22×9.5
Length—184.0 cm (72.4 in.)
Front PTO Type—Independent with electric clutch
Height—113.0 cm (44.5 in.)
Wheelbase—119.0 cm (46.9 in.)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons