Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Claas 95E vs Challenger MT743

A detailed comparison of the Claas 95E and the Challenger MT743. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Claas 95E305.8 kW (410.1 HP)
Challenger MT743317.0 kW (425.1 HP)
Weight
Claas 95E16100.0 kg (35494.4 lbs)
Challenger MT74315170.0 kg (33444.1 lbs)
SpecificationClaas 95EClaas 95EAgricultural TractorsChallenger MT743Challenger MT743Agricultural Tractors
Tractor TypeAgricultural Crawler TractorAgricultural Crawler Tractor
Horsepower305.8 kW (410.1 HP)317.0 kW (425.1 HP)
Weight16100.0 kg (35494.4 lbs)15170.0 kg (33444.1 lbs)
Transmission TypeFull power shiftInfinitely-variable transmission
Years Made1998-20012018-Present
Engine ModelCaterpillarAGCO Power 9.8 L
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeDieselDiesel
Cylinders67
Displacement11950 cc (729.2 cu in.)9799 cc (598.0 cu in.)
Bore13.00 cm (5.12 in.)11.10 cm (4.37 in.)
Stroke15.01 cm (5.91 in.)14.50 cm (5.71 in.)
Rear PTO Speed1.000 RPM—
Rated RPM2100 RPM1700 RPM
Compression Ratio16.0:1—
Battery12 V12 V
StarterElectricElectric
Wheelbase271.0 cm (106.7 in.)—
Track Size25 in. track—
Fuel Tank Capacity1060.0 l (280.0 gal)972.7 l (Standard: 180.0 gal (681.3 l) Optional: 215.0 gal (813.8 l) Optional: 257.0 gal)
Coolant Capacity75.7 l (20.0 gal)—
Gears10 forward and 2 reverseInfinite forward and reverse
ChassisCrawlerCrawler
Max. Travel Speed7.6 km/h (Forward: 18.0 MPH (28.9 km/h) Reverse: 4.7 MPH)14.0 km/h (Forward: 24.9 MPH (40.0 km/h) Reverse: 8.7 MPH)
BrakesHydraulic caliper disc—
Cabin TypeCabCab
Steering TypeHydrostatic differential steeringPower
Hydraulic TypeClosed centerLoad sensing
Total Flow151.4 LPM (40.0 GPM)—
Valves44 to 6
Lift Capacity—8618.0 kg (18999.4 lbs)
Pump Flow—439.1 LPM (58.0 GPM (219.6 LPM) 116.0 GPM)
DEF Tank—79.5 l (21.0 gal)
Transmission Model—Accu-VT Stepless / TA 300T
Drawbar Category—III/IVN

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons