SPECS / COMPARISON
Caterpillar D6N LGP WH vs Komatsu D60A-7
A detailed comparison of the Caterpillar D6N LGP WH and the Komatsu D60A-7. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Caterpillar D6N LGP WH111.9 kW (150 HP)
Komatsu D60A-7115.6 kW (155 HP)
Operating Weight
Caterpillar D6N LGP WH19256.8 kg (42454 lbs)
Komatsu D60A-712959.1 kg (28570 lbs)
| Specification | Caterpillar D6N LGP WH Crawler Dozers | Komatsu D60A-7 Crawler Dozers |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Crawler Dozer | Crawler Dozer |
| Horsepower | 111.9 kW (150 HP) | 115.6 kW (155 HP) |
| Operating Weight | 19256.8 kg (42454 lbs) | 12959.1 kg (28570 lbs) |
| Engine Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Komatsu |
| Engine Model | C6.6 ACERT | NH220-CI |
| Net Power | 111.9 kW (150 HP) | — |
| Displacement | 7193.9 cc (439 cu in.) | 12175.6 cc (743 cu in.) |
| Alternator Supplied Amp. | 95 A | — |
| Alternator | 95 A | — |
| Battery | 24 V | — |
| Fuel Capacity | 299.0 l (79 gal) | 320.2 l (84.6 gal) |
| Cab Height | 310.9 cm (122.4 in.) | 301.8 cm (118.8 in.) |
| Width Over Track | 249.9 cm (98.4 in.) | 240.8 cm (94.8 in.) |
| Length without Blade | 374.9 cm (147.6 in.) | 515.1 cm (202.8 in.) |
| Length of Track on Ground | 313.9 cm (123.6 in.) | 243.8 cm (96.0 in.) |
| Ground Clearance | 42.7 cm (16.8 in.) | — |
| Ground Contact Area | 133096.0 cm³ (8122 cu in.) | — |
| No of Shoes Per Side | 46 | — |
| No of Track Rollers Per Side | 8 | 6 |
| Shoe Size | 83.8 cm (33 in.) | 51.1 cm (20.1 in.) |
| Weight (Operating) | 19256.8 kg (42454 lbs) | 12959.1 kg (28570 lbs) |
| Gross Power | — | 115.6 kW (155 HP) |
| Transmission Type | — | helical gear constant mesh type |
| Number of Forward Gears | — | 5 |
| Number of Reverse Gears | — | 4 |
| Max Speed Forward | — | 11.1 km/h (6.9 mph) |
| Max Speed Reverse | — | 9.8 km/h (6.1 mph) |
| Ground Pressure | — | 0.5 bar (7.4 psi) |
| Cooling System Capacity | — | 55.3 l (14.6 gal) |
| Track Gauge | — | 189.0 cm (74.4 in.) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.