Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Caterpillar D5H II vs Komatsu D50P-16

A detailed comparison of the Caterpillar D5H II and the Komatsu D50P-16. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Caterpillar D5H II89.0 kW (119.4 HP)
Komatsu D50P-1688.0 kW (118 HP)
Operating Weight
Caterpillar D5H II13099.0 kg (28878.4 lbs)
Komatsu D50P-1613620.0 kg (30027 lbs)
SpecificationCaterpillar D5H IICaterpillar D5H IICrawler DozersKomatsu D50P-16Komatsu D50P-16Crawler Dozers
TypeCrawler DozerCrawler Dozer
Horsepower89.0 kW (119.4 HP)88.0 kW (118 HP)
Operating Weight13099.0 kg (28878.4 lbs)13620.0 kg (30027 lbs)
Pump Flow109.8 LPM (29 GPM)—
Engine ManufacturerCaterpillarKomatsu
Engine Model3304SL4D130-1
Gross Power89.0 kW (119.4 HP)88.0 kW (118 HP)
Displacement7000.6 cc (427.2 cu in.)8495.1 cc (518.4 cu in.)
Transmission TypePowerShiftDirect Drive
Number of Forward Gears34
Number of Reverse Gears33
Max Speed Forward10.1 km/h (6.3 mph)—
Max Speed Reverse12.6 km/h (7.8 mph)—
Ground Pressure0.5 bar (7.9 psi)0.2 bar (3.3 psi)
Fuel Capacity246.1 l (65 gal)—
Hydraulic Capacity40.1 l (10.6 gal)—
Hydraulic Pump Flow109.8 LPM (29 GPM)—
Relief Valve Pressure206.8 bar (3000 psi)—
Width Over Track231.6 cm (91.2 in.)292.6 cm (115.2 in.)
Length Overall454.2 cm (178.8 in.)496.8 cm (195.6 in.)
Length without Blade362.7 cm (142.8 in.)396.2 cm (156.0 in.)
Length of Track on Ground231.6 cm (91.2 in.)292.6 cm (115.2 in.)
Track Gauge182.9 cm (72.0 in.)207.3 cm (81.6 in.)
Ground Clearance39.6 cm (15.6 in.)42.7 cm (16.8 in.)
Ground Contact Area59691.7 cm³ (3642.6 cu in.)—
No of Track Rollers Per Side67
Shoe Size51.1 cm (20.1 in.)86.1 cm (33.9 in.)
Weight (Operating)13099.0 kg (28878.4 lbs)13620.0 kg (30027 lbs)
Number of Cylinders—4
Power Measured RPM—1900 RPM
Cab Height—292.6 cm (115.2 in.)
No of Carrier Rollers Per Side—2
No of Shoes Per Side—47
Track Pitch—17.5 cm (6.9 in.)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons