Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Caterpillar 5230 ME vs Caterpillar 5230

A detailed comparison of the Caterpillar 5230 ME and the Caterpillar 5230. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Caterpillar 5230 ME1096 kW (1470 HP)
Caterpillar 52301096 kW (1470 HP)
Weight
Caterpillar 5230 ME316600 kg (697984 lbs)
Caterpillar 5230318500 kg (702172 lbs)
Operating Weight
Caterpillar 5230 ME316600 kg (697984 lbs)
Caterpillar 5230318500 kg (702172 lbs)
SpecificationCaterpillar 5230 MECaterpillar 5230 MEMining ShovelsCaterpillar 5230Caterpillar 5230Mining Shovels
Excavator TypeMining ShovelMining Shovel
Weight316600 kg (697984 lbs)318500 kg (702172 lbs)
Horsepower1096 kW (1470 HP)1096 kW (1470 HP)
Track Length7528.6 cm (2964.0 in.)9814.6 cm (3864.0 in.)
Length of Track on Ground627.9 cm (247.2 in.)819.9 cm (322.8 in.)
Ground Clearance112.8 cm (44.4 in.)—
Tail Swing Radius646.2 cm (254.4 in.)—
Overall Width630.9 cm (248.4 in.)—
Engine MakeCaterpillarCaterpillar
Engine Model3516 EUI3516 EUI
Net Power1096 kW (1470 HP)1096 kW (1470 HP)
Gross Power1104.6 kW (1481.3 HP)1104.6 kW (1481.3 HP)
Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity2.248 LPM (594 GPM)—
Relief Valve Pressure350 Bar (5080 psi)—
Operating Weight316600 kg (697984 lbs)318500 kg (702172 lbs)
Max Travel Speed2.6 km (1.6 mph)2.6 km (1.6 mph)
Cab Height746.8 cm (294.0 in.)746.8 cm (294.0 in.)
Displacement69001.0 cc (4211 cu. in.)—
Shoe Size130.0 cm (51.2 in.)—
Track Gauge521.2 cm (205.2 in.)—
Removal Counterweight Clearance246.9 cm (97.2 in.)—
Drawbar Pull154.620 kg (340875 lbs)—
Max Digging Reach—1002.8 cm (394.8 in.)
Upper Structure Ground Clearance—246.9 cm (97.2 in.)
Loading Shovel Shoe Width—1801.4 cm (709.2 in.)
Loading Shovel Operating Weight—318.503 kg (702172.4 lbs)
Height of Track—228.6 cm (90.0 in.)
Fuel Capacity—5330.2 l (1408.1 gal)
Loading Shovel Ground Pressure—153.1 kPa (22.2 psi)
Max Cutting Height—1502.7 cm (591.6 in.)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons