Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Caterpillar 349F vs Caterpillar 349E

A detailed comparison of the Caterpillar 349F and the Caterpillar 349E. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Caterpillar 349F295 kW (396 HP)
Caterpillar 349E295 kW (396 HP)
Weight
Caterpillar 349F53297 kg (117500 lbs)
Caterpillar 349E53297 kg (117500 lbs)
Operating Weight
Caterpillar 349F53297 kg (117500 lbs)
Caterpillar 349E53297 kg (117500 lbs)
SpecificationCaterpillar 349FCaterpillar 349FLarge ExcavatorsCaterpillar 349ECaterpillar 349ELarge Excavators
Excavator TypeLarge ExcavatorLarge Excavator
Weight53297 kg (117500 lbs)53297 kg (117500 lbs)
Horsepower295 kW (396 HP)295 kW (396 HP)
Digging Depth820 cm (323 in.)762 cm (300 in.)
Max Digging Depth820 cm (323 in.)762 cm (300 in.)
Max Reach Along Ground1213.1 cm (477.6 in.)1170.4 cm (460.8 in.)
Track Length5242.6 cm (2064.0 in.)—
Length of Track on Ground438.9 cm (172.8 in.)—
Ground Clearance48.8 cm (19.2 in.)—
Tail Swing Radius378.0 cm (148.8 in.)—
Overall Width335.3 cm (132.0 in.)—
Engine MakeCaterpillarCaterpillar
Engine ModelC13 ACERTC13 ACERT
Net Power295 kW (396 HP)295 kW (396 HP)
Gross Power322 kw (432 hp)322 kw (432 hp)
Hydraulic System Capacity570.1 l (150.6 gal)570.1 l (150.6 gal)
Operating Weight53297 kg (117500 lbs)53297 kg (117500 lbs)
Swing Speed8.7 RPM8.7 RPM
Cab Height323.1 cm (127.2 in.)—
Cooling Capacity50.0 l (13.2 gal)50.0 l (13.2 gal)
Fuel Capacity719.2 l (190.0 gal)719.2 l (190.0 gal)
Swing Drive Capacity9.8 l (2.6 gal)9.8 l (2.6 gal)
Engine Oil Capacity43.2 l (11.4 gal)43.2 l (11.4 gal)
Stroke15.7 cm (6.2 in)15.7 cm (6.2 in)
Bore13.2 cm (5.2 in)13.2 cm (5.2 in)
Number of Carrier Rollers per Side32
Number of Track Rollers per Side99
Number of Shoes per Side5252
Displacement12503.3 cc (763 cu. in.)12503.3 cc (763 cu. in.)
Removal Counterweight Clearance128.0 cm (50.4 in.)—
Drawbar Pull34.156 kg (75300 lbs)34.156 kg (75300 lbs)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons