Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Allis Chalmers HD11 vs International Harvester 3588

A detailed comparison of the Allis Chalmers HD11 and the International Harvester 3588. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Allis Chalmers HD1196.9 kW (130.0 HP)
International Harvester 3588112.2 kW (150.5 HP)
Weight
Allis Chalmers HD1110070.0 kg (22200.5 lbs)
International Harvester 35887990.0 kg (17614.9 lbs)
SpecificationAllis Chalmers HD11Allis Chalmers HD11Agricultural TractorsInternational Harvester 3588International Harvester 3588Agricultural Tractors
Tractor TypeAgricultural Crawler TractorFarm Tractor
Horsepower96.9 kW (130.0 HP)112.2 kW (150.5 HP)
Weight10070.0 kg (22200.5 lbs)7990.0 kg (17614.9 lbs)
Transmission TypeSliding gearTwo-range power shift
Length391.0 cm (153.9 in.)—
Years Made1955-19651978-1981
Engine ModelAllis ChalmersInternational Harvester
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeDieselDiesel
Cylinders66
Displacement8456 cc (516.0 cu in.)7636 cc (466.0 cu in.)
Bore11.30 cm (4.45 in.)10.90 cm (4.29 in.)
Stroke14.10 cm (5.55 in.)13.59 cm (5.35 in.)
Rated RPM1800 RPM2400 RPM
Compression Ratio15.0:1—
BatteryTwo 12V12 V
StarterElectricElectric
Height213.0 cm (83.9 in.)—
Fuel Tank Capacity227.0 l (60.0 gal)340.7 l (90.0 gal)
Gears6 forward and 3 reverse16 forward and 8 reverse
ChassisCrawler4×4 4WD
Max. Travel Speed7.1 km/h (Forward: 5.7 MPH (9.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.4 MPH)16.1 km/h (Forward: 20.4 MPH (32.8 km/h) Reverse: 10.0 MPH)
BrakesContracting band—
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationCab
Pump Flow—45.4 LPM (12.0 GPM)
Rear PTO Type—Independent
Rear PTO Speed—1.000 RPM
Wheelbase—279.0 cm (109.8 in.)
Coolant Capacity—32.2 l (8.5 gal)
Transmission Oil Capacity—89.4 l (23.6 gal)
Drawbar Category—III
Steering Type—Power
Front Tires—Ag: 18.4-38
Rear Tires—Ag: 18.4-38
Hydraulic Type—Closed center
Valves—2

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons